<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs with great subtitles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickherder.com/blogs-with-great-subtitles/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickherder.com/blogs-with-great-subtitles</link>
	<description>Monkey monkey is new monkey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:38:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.clickherder.com/blogs-with-great-subtitles/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickherder.com/?p=14#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Ok, here&#039;s my ratings for each of these taglines:&lt;ol&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Short and to the point, if lacking in humor hooking power. &lt;b&gt;65%&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Yes it&#039;s funny, but it doesn&#039;t exactly sell the site.  I wouldn&#039;t have read more if I didn&#039;t already know who Guy was. &lt;b&gt;40%&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;This is awesome: this apparently fruity, carefree caption is actually a wink to the Google-conscious crowd.  Brilliant. &lt;b&gt;92%&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Maybe it&#039;s just my absurdist sense of humor, but I find this very funny, and also very much on topic. &lt;b&gt;94%&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;I couldn&#039;t score this higher than 3 &amp; 4 even though I wanted to.  It makes me laugh, but is it just because I know the author?  No, I think this punchline is some universal appeal.  Truth is, SEO &amp; webmarketing, as evolving disciplines, &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; getting really hard.  &lt;b&gt;91%&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;The punchline for this site wasn&#039;t mentioned, I note.  I give us (and I&#039;m being humble) at least an &lt;b&gt;89%&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;And what about Mymotech&#039;s &quot;Analytics, SEO &amp; Stuff?&quot;  It&#039;s not a knee slapper, but it sure gets the point across.  It gets at least a &lt;b&gt;75%&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, here&#8217;s my ratings for each of these taglines:
<ol></ol>
</p>
<p>
<li>Short and to the point, if lacking in humor hooking power. <b>65%</b></li>
</p>
<p>
<li>Yes it&#8217;s funny, but it doesn&#8217;t exactly sell the site.  I wouldn&#8217;t have read more if I didn&#8217;t already know who Guy was. <b>40%</b></li>
</p>
<p>
<li>This is awesome: this apparently fruity, carefree caption is actually a wink to the Google-conscious crowd.  Brilliant. <b>92%</b></li>
</p>
<p>
<li>Maybe it&#8217;s just my absurdist sense of humor, but I find this very funny, and also very much on topic. <b>94%</b></li>
</p>
<p>
<li>I couldn&#8217;t score this higher than 3 &#038; 4 even though I wanted to.  It makes me laugh, but is it just because I know the author?  No, I think this punchline is some universal appeal.  Truth is, <span class="caps">SEO </span>&#038; webmarketing, as evolving disciplines, <i>are</i> getting really hard.  <b>91%</b></li>
</p>
<p>
<li>The punchline for this site wasn&#8217;t mentioned, I note.  I give us (and I&#8217;m being humble) at least an <b>89%</b>.</li>
</p>
<p>
<li>And what about Mymotech&#8217;s &#8220;Analytics, <span class="caps">SEO </span>&#038; Stuff?&#8221;  It&#8217;s not a knee slapper, but it sure gets the point across.  It gets at least a <b>75%</b>.</li></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
