<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Clickherder Roundup, Episode 6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clickherder.com/the-clickherder-roundup-episode-6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clickherder.com/the-clickherder-roundup-episode-6</link>
	<description>Monkey monkey is new monkey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:38:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.clickherder.com/the-clickherder-roundup-episode-6/comment-page-1#comment-7527</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 17:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickherder.com/the-clickherder-roundup-episode-6#comment-7527</guid>
		<description>Quad - As if we didnt know that Adwords and Adsense are JavaScript. (However I do have interesting proof of Yahoo SLURP indexing them)

In any case the grander point, which you at your granular level have failed to comprehend is that Google FUD&#039;ing about the interweb with proclamations against paid links is dumb, duplicitous, and hypocritical.

We have never made a commitment to any sort of moral standing on this site, and nor are we likely to. (Or journalistic integrity for that matter).

Thanks for watching. We do really appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quad &#8211; As if we didnt know that Adwords and Adsense are JavaScript. (However I do have interesting proof of Yahoo <span class="caps">SLURP</span> indexing them)</p>
<p>In any case the grander point, which you at your granular level have failed to comprehend is that Google <span class="caps">FUD</span>&#8217;ing about the interweb with proclamations against paid links is dumb, duplicitous, and hypocritical.</p>
<p>We have never made a commitment to any sort of moral standing on this site, and nor are we likely to. (Or journalistic integrity for that matter).</p>
<p>Thanks for watching. We do really appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quadrille</title>
		<link>http://www.clickherder.com/the-clickherder-roundup-episode-6/comment-page-1#comment-6813</link>
		<dc:creator>Quadrille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 09:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickherder.com/the-clickherder-roundup-episode-6#comment-6813</guid>
		<description>Adwords are not &#039;paidlinks&#039;, because they&#039;re javascript.

If you cannot criticise Google without seeking to mislead your audience, how &#039;evil&#039; are you?

And if you (really) cannot see the problem with paidlinks (which I find just a little hard to believe), why not read up on it?

Next time, do the research before opening the mouths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adwords are not &#8216;paidlinks&#8217;, because they&#8217;re javascript.</p>
<p>If you cannot criticise Google without seeking to mislead your audience, how &#8216;evil&#8217; are you?</p>
<p>And if you (really) cannot see the problem with paidlinks (which I find just a little hard to believe), why not read up on it?</p>
<p>Next time, do the research before opening the mouths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
